![]() So, a better wording would be to say that git fetch updates your locally-stored remote-tracking branches with the latest changes from their respective remote branches which they track.Īlso, this line was very helpful. So, some people may say local tracking branch and mean a locally-stored branch which tracks a remote branch, and that is a true and correct statement. This is because there is such a thing as local tracking branches if what you mean is a local (meaning: stored locally on your computer's hard drive) branch which is a tracking branch, meaning it tracks a remote branch. So, when you say there's no such concept of local tracking branches, only remote tracking branches, that's not quite true-it depends how you word it and what you mean, as that English is ambiguous. git fetch updates your locally-stored remote-tracking branches to contain the latest changes from their respective remote branches. I find this part ironic because it further causes confusion about branches and tracking branches and git fetch. So origin/master is a remote tracking branch for master in the origin repo There's no such concept of local tracking branches, only remote tracking branches. If the object is a blob, the contents are written into the file, rather than its object name.See "Having a hard time understanding git-fetch" Then you may need to deleted local merged branch by hand with git branch -d .git/lost-found/other/, depending on type. After merging a branch Im able to delete the branch on remote. This is now default you can turn it off with -no-full. full Check not just objects in GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY ($GIT_DIR/objects), but also the ones found in alternate object pools listed in GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES or $GIT_DIR/objects/info/alternates, and in packed Git archives found in $GIT_DIR/objects/pack and corresponding pack subdirectories in alternate object pools. This option is meant only to search for commits that used to be in a ref, but now arenât, but are still in that corresponding reflog -unreachable: Print out objects that exist but that arenât reachable from any of the reference nodes. It verifies the connectivity and validity of the objects in the database -no-reflogs Do not consider commits that are referenced only by an entry in a reflog to be reachable. git/lost-found.txt git fsck: file system check. This can be further simplified by git config true this is a per-repo setting that will make any future git fetch or git pull to automatically prune. Git fsck -full -no-reflogs -unreachable -lost-found | grep commit | cut -d\ -f3 | xargs -n 1 git log -n 1 -pretty=oneline >. git fetch -prune On a regular basis in each repo to remove local branches that have been tracking a remote branch that is deleted (no longer exists in remote GIT repo). Finally, I recreated the deleted branch by doing: git branch hotfix-whatever-branch Īll I did to do after this is to push the branch and voila, the branch was restored successfully! ![]() I could open this file with my editor to find the sha by my commit message (I was glad I remembered some key words in it) and made sure if the changes are what I did: git log -p Ä£. Git fsck -full -no-reflogs -unreachable -lost-found | grep commit | cut -d\ -f3 | xargs -n 1 git log -n 1 -pretty=oneline >. Since my commit is not in the reflog, I had to do this to print out and ultimately find my commitâs sha.What I did to restore the local branch is as follow: I deleted both a local and its remote branch on origin! ?ââ And the branch I deleted is still in a Merge (Pull) Request! ? I used a third party app called SourceTree (Iâm sure you heard of it) to delete them, so my commit is not in the reflog I ran into this when I was cleaning up my local git. ![]() Git: How to restore (recreated) a deleted remote git branch
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |